5
As of February 2016, after 416 posts, and over six and a half years of blogging, I'm taking a break.
I've explained why here. There's plenty of past posts to read, though - hope you enjoy them !
Looking for a brilliant present for a young naturalist ? Buy my book ! Available from Amazon UK,
Amazon US and worldwide but buy from a local bookshop if you can.

The roe buck with the odd missing teeth

Jake
Jake

Last weekend I went out walking in Quoiggs wood as a present for someone called Darren. He was from Malaysia and he had emailed me asking if I would like a tree shrew skull as a present, then he sent through a whole load of amazing stuff that I'm going to write about later.  To say thanks I offered to send him a roe deer but when I looked in my spares box there wasn't one there, so I went out specially to Quoiggs Wood where I knew there were a few roe deer skeletons.

There were two roe skeletons, but the one I picked had both lower jaws. It was lying with the spine almost as it died, with its head lying at the edge of a stream. The legs were scattered a little bit further apart having been pulled apart by foxes:





It was in good condition but a little muddy so I started by using my S6 cleaner. I simmered it for a few hours each time with biological washing powder.



The water soon got mucky so I had to change it three times:


This is what it looked like after four washes. You can probably see something unusual about this skull already.


To whiten it some more I put it in 9% peroxide for 24 hours, which was enough to clean it but not whiten it completely:


This is how it looked when it had dried:


This was a male roe deer because of the pedicles (bone columns on the top of the skull that the antlers go on). It looked like it had no antlers but if you look closely you can see there is softer bone. Roe deer antlers fall off each year in November or December, and new antlers start to grow then, so this must have died near the end of the year, maybe the end of 2011 since the bones weren't green yet/


When I first saw the missing top cheek teeth I thought they must have fallen out which sometimes happens with older deer skulls.


When I had a closer look I realised the holes that the tooth roots go in were covered up with bone, meaning the teeth fell out while the deer was still living:


Here's a closer look with the top teeth, with the front teeth on the right. The missing teeth are the third pre-molar (PM3) and the first molar (M1):

This is very unusual and the first time I had ever seen anything like this. There was no obvious damage and the teeth would be inside the cheek so would be quite difficult to dislodge. I have no idea what caused it.

The other thing that was odd was the lower left jaw, which would have pressed against those teeth. Here is the jaw with from left to right the adult premolar teeth (PM1, PM2, PM3) and the three molar teeth (M1, M2, M3). Because all six adult teeth were through that means it was at least 13 months old when it died (see my teeth guide here). Sine roe deer are born in May/June, if it died in December, it would have been 1 year and 5 months OR 2 years and five months OR three years and five months etc etc.



The unusual teeth are the M1 and M2 which would have gone in the gap where the missing teeth are. Deer teeth get worn down as they get older because they grind down food between their teeth. Because   these bottom teeth didn't have anything to grind against they hadn't got worn down as much. This is the M2 where the first cusp (spike) isn't worn down but the second one is.



It's more obvious is you compare it to another roe deer buck skull I have, called George. Using clues, I worked out that George was about 13 months old when he died. Here George's lower jaw is at top and the new roe buck jaw is at the bottom:


Here are some of the things you can see by comparing the jaw to George's jaw:

  • George's cheek teeth are wider. I don't know why that is.
  • The new roe buck's teeth are more worn down. You can see it with the third tooth from the left (PM3) where the top tooth (George) has about twice as much above the gumline (the line between brown and white).
  • George's M1 and M2 teeth (the fourth and fifth from the left) are more worn than the new roe buck's M1 and M2. George's M1 tooth would have come through at about 2 months old, so it would have had 11 months wear by the time he died. George's M2 would have come through at about 9 months so it would have had four months wear. It looks like the new roe buck's teeth didn't have any wear at all, as if they had never ever rubbed against top teeth.


Here are the two jaws again with George's jaw at bottom and the new roe buck's jaw at top. They are the other way round than the picture above. You can see the new roe buck teeth has worn more because you can see more of the brown dentine.


You can also see a slight kink in the jaw of the new roe deer skull, which might explain why George's teeth are longer side to side.


This is what the two skulls look like from above with George's skull at top and the new skull at bottom.  The pedicles on the new skull are much wider, which I think it because it is older.


Underneath you can see the two cracks on George's skull on the left have fully fused in the new skull on the right meaning it the new skull is much older:


There was also something odd on the left of the braincase.There was a slight hole (bottom arrow) as if it had been injured by something going in from above, and there was a slight indentation (top arrow). The top indentation has healed and covered up the suture (crack) between the skull plates, so it must have happened while it was alive. It didn't seem to go through into the brain case.



I have still got some more work to send off before I send it off to Darren. It's not a perfect skull, but because of that I think it is more interesting that way because it tells a history of the animals life.

My guess is that the roe buck had gum disease around the upper PM3 and M1, and that the teeth fell out without showing any bone damage, but I will never really know whether this is true.



Enjoy this post ? Share it !


8 comments :

Psydrache said...

I think this is a very special skull and a very good gift for Darren :) I love the pedicles of this skull, it looks like it had strong antlers once. Too bad that they fallen off.

Jake said...

There's a lot of roe buck skulls I find with no antlers because Christmas is when they tend to die in the cold weather.

Jack N said...

Awesome, I saw a badger skull with porous tooth sockets like that, except about half were porous and the jaw was a bit malformed.I think it got hit by a car or something.

Darren said...

The skull look awesome! :)
The tooth socket is very interesting.
Can't wait to get it! :D


THANKS JAKE!

Jake said...

It could be old age too.

Jake said...

I've still got some work to do and I'll let you know when I post it !

Belinda Davis said...

Hi Jake,
I was talking with my husband yesterday and we were wondering why the ground is not littered with centuries of bones. Although some are eaten or crushed etc surely there would be more lying around? Can you shed some light on this? Thanks in advance :)

Jake said...

Skeletons can get buried pretty quickly even left just lying on top of the ground, but it's strange, yes. I'll think about it and try to do a post on it soon !




Free counters!